Thrill
There is nothing to answer with. The operator's own pages could not be opened, so no verification clause could be read, and none is invented here. The register side is unusually clear instead: two authorities carry this brand under two companies whose names are almost identical.
The record
Taken from thrill.com on 2026-08-26. Terms change without notice — treat this as the date it was read, not as today.
Thrill is the only one of these five brands where the two registers point at companies with near-identical names. Curaçao has Gravity Unleashed B.V.; Anjouan has Gravity Unleashed Limitada.
Everywhere else in the library, the two names on a brand have nothing to do with each other. Here they echo, and that is exactly why both entries deserve a careful read.
The Curaçao certificate is OGL/2024/1052/0508, status Active, company number 165275, granted on 2 September 2025. The Anjouan entry is ALSI-202506019-FI1, valid from 19 June 2025 to 18 June 2027.
The operator's terms would not open. So there is no rating and no ranking place — only two register entries and a count of game providers.
What do the two register entries say?
The Curaçao Gaming Authority certificate portal answers for thrill.com with OGL/2024/1052/0508, status Active, Gravity Unleashed B.V., company number 165275, granted 2 September 2025.
The Anjouan Gaming Board public register carries the brand under ALSI-202506019-FI1 with Gravity Unleashed Limitada as holder. The entry is valid, issued on 19 June 2025 and running to 18 June 2027.
Why are two near-identical company names unusual?
Across the rest of the library the two names attached to a brand are unrelated: one company in one jurisdiction and a completely different one in the other.
Here they read as Gravity Unleashed B.V. and Gravity Unleashed Limitada. That is the kind of overlap you can see for yourself, without anyone interpreting it for you.
What can the shared name prove, and what can it not?
Neither entry states any relationship between the two companies. Each register documents one permission granted to one legal entity, and that is the extent of what they record.
A name is not an identity. The echo makes the thread easier to follow, but it does not say who would hold a balance if something went wrong.
What could not be read at the operator itself?
No verification clause, no withdrawal cap, no restricted-country list, no coin list and no founding year. The pages did not open, so there is nothing to quote.
Twenty-one of the 100 sources in the library could not be opened either. That is a statement about readability and never an argument in the operator's favour.
What do 47 game providers tell you about a withdrawal?
The shared library records 47 game providers on the site. It is one of the few figures that could be recorded about this operator at all.
The number describes the lobby. It says nothing about which documents are demanded, how much may leave at once, or how long an approval takes.
Why does Thrill carry no rating?
A score is calculated from the operator's own material, and here the fields are empty. Two register entries and a provider count are not a basis for a number.
A low number would look like a measurement and would be invented. The field stays blank, and the brand enters no ranking.
What applies to a player based in Denmark?
Neither Curaçao nor Anjouan is a Danish permission. Spillemyndigheden supervises the operators it has licensed under Lov om spil, and MitID requires a certified Danish broker and a Danish CVR number.
Skattestyrelsen treats a win as tax-free only where the game is based in an EU or EEA country under public supervision there and a corresponding game is approved in Denmark. Neither jurisdiction qualifies. Take your position to Skattestyrelsen.
Step by step
Search the Curaçao portal
Read the number, status, company and date on the certificate, and record company number 165275.
Search the Anjouan register
Note ALSI-202506019-FI1, the holder and both dates. This entry predates the Curaçao certificate.
Compare the two names letter by letter
Gravity Unleashed B.V. and Gravity Unleashed Limitada echo each other, but they are two entries in two jurisdictions.
Try to open the terms
If they will not open, verification and withdrawal limits are undescribed. That is the answer, not a failure of your search.
Separate the lobby from the terms
The 47 providers describe the game list. Set that number aside when judging how a withdrawal is handled.
Things you can check yourself
Each of these can be confirmed without taking this page's word for it: in the register that issued the licence, or in the operator's own terms at the clause named.
- Certificate OGL/2024/1052/0508 shows the status Active in the Curaçao Gaming Authority certificate portal.
- The certificate text names Gravity Unleashed B.V., company number 165275, and a licence granted on 2 September 2025.
- The Anjouan Gaming Board public register carries the brand under ALSI-202506019-FI1, holder Gravity Unleashed Limitada, valid until 18 June 2027.
- The two registers name two companies with near-identical names in two different jurisdictions.
- No verification clause, withdrawal cap, restricted-country list or coin list could be read at the operator.
Questions about Thrill
Will Thrill ask me for documents?
Not stated. The operator's pages could not be opened, so no verification clause could be read, and this page does not guess.
Who is behind Thrill?
The Curaçao certificate names Gravity Unleashed B.V.; the Anjouan entry names Gravity Unleashed Limitada.
Do the matching names mean one company?
The registers do not say so. Each documents a permission granted to one legal entity, and a shared name is not a shared identity.
Why is there no rating for Thrill?
Because the operator's own material could not be read. Two register entries and a provider count are not enough to calculate anything.
How many game providers are there?
The shared library records 47 providers on the site. The figure describes the game list and says nothing about payouts.
Is there a withdrawal cap?
None could be read. That does not mean none exists, only that the operator publishes none where this page could read it.
Would a win be tax-free in Denmark?
Tax-free treatment requires a game based in the EU or EEA under public supervision there. Curaçao and Anjouan are outside both. Take your position to Skattestyrelsen.
Where this operator fits
The pages on this site that cover the same ground.