Nordic Krypto CasinoDansk

Roobet

Not stated anywhere this page could read. The operator's own pages would not open, so no verification clause exists to quote, and no guess is offered here. What does exist is two register entries carrying this one brand under two different companies — and that is a check any reader can repeat in two minutes.

The record

Taken from roobet.com on 2026-08-26. Terms change without notice — treat this as the date it was read, not as today.

Roobet appears in two public registers, and the two entries name two different companies. Neither entry is wrong; they simply answer different questions.

The Curaçao side is certificate OGL/2024/687/0427, status Active, granted on 31 July 2024 to Raw Entertainment B.V., company number 157205.

The Anjouan side is ALSI-202507005, held by Ultima Spins Ltd, valid from 17 July 2025 to 16 July 2027.

The operator's own terms would not open. That is why there is no rating and no ranking place: there is nothing to measure, only two register entries to read.

What does the Curaçao certificate say?

A search on roobet.com returns certificate OGL/2024/687/0427 with the status Active. The text names Raw Entertainment B.V. and Curaçao company number 157205.

The licence was granted on 31 July 2024. Number, status, company and date are the four fields the entry holds, and every one of them can be checked.

What does the Anjouan public register hold?

The register carries the brand under ALSI-202507005 with Ultima Spins Ltd as holder. The entry is valid, issued on 17 July 2025 and running to 16 July 2027.

Ultima Spins Ltd and Raw Entertainment B.V. are not the same company, and the two authorities are not the same authority.

What follows from two companies sharing one brand?

A licence is granted to a company, not to a shopfront. One brand can therefore appear in several places with a different legal owner each time, without any entry being false.

In the library, 68 of 100 brands publish a licence number but only 53 distinct numbers exist. The question is not whether a licence exists, but which company would be holding your balance.

Why is an Anjouan number without the FI suffix worth noticing?

The number ALSI-202507005 carries no FI suffix. Of the 39 Anjouan entries in the library, 38 do carry one.

That is a difference in form, not a verdict. It is also exactly the kind of detail you can compare yourself when two entries both describe themselves as valid.

What could not be read at the operator itself?

No verification clause, no withdrawal cap, no restricted-country list, no coin list and no founding year. The pages did not open.

Twenty-one of the 100 sources in the library could not be opened either. That is a fact about readability, and never a point in the operator's favour.

Why does Roobet carry no rating?

The score is built from the operator's own material. Here there are no fields to fill, and two register entries cannot stand in for a verification clause.

A low number would look like a measurement. So the field stays empty, and the brand enters no ranking on this site.

What does this mean for a player in Denmark?

Neither Curaçao nor Anjouan is a Danish permission. Spillemyndigheden supervises the operators it has licensed under Lov om spil, so a complaint about Roobet reaches the wrong regulator.

MitID needs a certified Danish broker and a Danish CVR number. Tax-free treatment requires a game based in the EU or EEA under public supervision there, and neither jurisdiction sits there. Take your position to Skattestyrelsen.

Step by step

  1. Search the Curaçao portal

    Read the number, status, company and date on the certificate. Record the company number alongside the name.

  2. Search the Anjouan register

    Note ALSI-202507005, the holder and both dates exactly as the entry states them.

  3. Compare the two holders

    Raw Entertainment B.V. and Ultima Spins Ltd are two companies. Only one of them could be behind your account.

  4. Look at the shape of the number

    This Anjouan number lacks the FI suffix that 38 of the 39 entries in the library carry. Compare it with another entry yourself.

  5. Try to open the terms

    If they will not open, you know that verification and withdrawal limits are undescribed. That is the answer, not a failed search.

Things you can check yourself

Each of these can be confirmed without taking this page's word for it: in the register that issued the licence, or in the operator's own terms at the clause named.

Questions about Roobet

Will Roobet ask me for documents?

Not stated. The operator's pages could not be opened, so no verification clause could be read, and a guess would not be an answer.

Who is behind Roobet?

Two registers give two names: Raw Entertainment B.V. on the Curaçao certificate and Ultima Spins Ltd in the Anjouan entry.

Does Roobet hold a valid licence?

Both register entries stand as valid. That tells you two companies were each granted a permission, and nothing about how a withdrawal is handled.

Why is there no rating for Roobet?

Because the operator's own material could not be read. Two register entries are not enough for a calculation, and a low number would fake a measurement.

Is there a withdrawal cap?

None could be read. That does not mean none exists, only that the operator publishes none where this page could read it.

Is Denmark on the restricted list?

No restricted-country list could be read, so the question cannot be answered from the operator's own material.

Can I log in with MitID?

No. MitID requires a Danish licence, a certified Danish broker and a Danish CVR number, none of which follows from these two register entries.

Would a win be tax-free in Denmark?

Tax-free treatment requires a game based in the EU or EEA under public supervision there. Curaçao and Anjouan are outside both. Take your position to Skattestyrelsen.

Where this operator fits

The pages on this site that cover the same ground.

Other reviews