Bitcoin and crypto casinos by coin
Each coin brings its own network, fees and confirmation time. These pages explain what the network actually does with the money you plan to deposit.
The short answer
The coin decides three things: what the transfer costs, how long it takes to confirm, and whether the balance is still worth what you put in. It decides nothing at all about verification. Among the thirty-eight operators whose own documents could be read end to end, Bitcoin is accepted by twenty-eight, Ethereum by twenty-seven, Litecoin and Tether by twenty-two each, Dogecoin by seventeen and TRON by fourteen.
Which coin to deposit in is really a question about which network you are sending on, and the network is where the cost and the waiting live. An on-chain Bitcoin transfer priced too cheaply during a busy hour sits unconfirmed for hours; the same money over Lightning clears in seconds. Ethereum mainnet and a layer-2 like Arbitrum or Base are two different fee worlds. Tether on TRON settles for cents.
The acceptance numbers on this page come from the thirty-eight operators in our library whose own material could be read in full: Bitcoin at twenty-eight of them, Ethereum at twenty-seven, Litecoin and Tether at twenty-two each, Dogecoin at seventeen, TRON at fourteen. For the operators we could not read — nineteen of the hundred sit behind bot protection that blocks automated reading of their terms — the coin field is empty, and empty means unread rather than not accepted.
What the coin does not change is the part people most want it to change. Only five of the hundred operators publish the amount at which verification starts, and none of the five makes that figure depend on which asset you deposited. Choosing a private coin does not move the threshold, and it does not make you anonymous to the company holding your balance.
What the coin actually changes
Cost and speed come first, and they belong to the network rather than to the casino. Bitcoin on-chain follows congestion, and its fee is set by you when you send; Lightning removes most of that for small and medium amounts. Ethereum mainnet is priced by demand while Arbitrum and Base settle for a fraction of it. Litecoin and Dogecoin are cheap and quick by design. Tether exists on both TRON and Ethereum and the network decides the cost, not the ticker.
The second thing the coin changes is whether your balance holds still. A thousand kroner deposited in Bitcoin can be worth nine hundred by the time you withdraw, entirely independently of how the session went, and it can go the other way too. A stablecoin removes that variable and replaces it with two others: exposure to the dollar for anyone thinking in kroner, and an issuer — Tether is a claim on a private company, not a bearer asset.
The third is the one that costs people real money and has nothing to do with markets. Sending on the wrong network — mainnet ETH to a layer-2 address, an ERC-20 transfer to a TRC-20 deposit address — usually means the funds are not credited, and whether they can be recovered depends entirely on the operator's support desk. A small test transaction the first time you use a new coin at a new casino costs a few kroner and removes the only genuinely unrecoverable mistake in the process.
Where the acceptance numbers come from
Every count on these pages is taken from an operator's own published material. A hundred operators are in the library. Thirty-eight of them published terms and payment pages that could be read from end to end, and it is those thirty-eight the coin counts describe: twenty-eight for Bitcoin, twenty-seven for Ethereum, twenty-two each for Litecoin and Tether, seventeen for Dogecoin and fourteen for TRON.
Nineteen of the hundred sit behind bot protection that blocks automated reading of their terms. Their records are incomplete and the pages carrying them say so. This matters more than it sounds: an empty coin field on a review here does not mean the operator refuses that asset, it means nobody has read the page where it would have said so, and turning silence into a claim is how most affiliate coin tables are built.
The practical consequence is that a coin page here is a starting point, not a substitute for the deposit page. Networks are added and dropped quietly, a casino can support an asset on one chain and not another, and the operator's own cashier is the only place that is current. What these pages give you is which operators were recorded as accepting the asset when their material was read, and what the network does to the money in transit.
The coin does not move the verification clause
Five of the hundred operators publish the amount at which verification starts. Bitcasino.io, Sportsbet.io and LiveCasino.io each state €2,500, Rocketpot states $2,500, and Empire.io states 2,000 USDT. Those are quotable because the operator wrote them down. Note what even these five say: all of them additionally reserve the right to ask below the stated figure, so the number is where checks become likely rather than where they begin.
For the other ninety-five there is no published figure at all. The field is empty in our records, and an empty field means we did not establish it — never that there is no limit, and certainly not that any amount can be withdrawn undocumented. One documented test sits alongside those blanks: in May 2026 our editor ran real money through TrustDice and withdrew repeatedly with no documents asked until cumulative withdrawals reached about $5,000, at which point verification ran through Veriff, a driving licence was rejected, a passport was accepted on the fifth attempt, and roughly $900 remained locked and was never paid out.
That test is a single observation on a single account at a single moment, and it is worth exactly that. What it is not is a policy, and it is not transferable to another operator or to another coin. Depositing in Monero does not change any of it: a chain nobody can read is not the same as a casino that cannot see you, and the operator sees every bet, holds the balance, and writes the clause that decides when it asks.
Reading a coin page here, from Denmark
Each coin page opens with the ranking, and the ranking comes from the same published formula used everywhere on this site: fields taken from the operator's own terms or from the register that issued its licence, with an unread field scoring zero rather than an average. Below it the page deals with the network — confirmations, fees, the layer or chain the casino actually credits — and with which operators in the library were recorded as accepting the asset.
For a Danish reader there is a currency layer under all of it. Almost nothing here pays out in kroner: a balance is held in the coin or in a major fiat currency, and the conversion happens at the exchange rather than at the casino. That means two spreads on a round trip and a session priced in something other than the currency you think in, which is worth deciding about before you deposit rather than at cash-out.
None of this substitutes for the thing that separates a Danish-licensed casino from the rest. An operator inside the Danish system identifies you with MitID before you play and is visible to Spillemyndigheden if a payout is refused; an operator outside it does neither, whichever coin you send. That trade is the subject of the whole site, and choosing a cheaper network does not change either side of it.
Questions about coins and networks
Which coin do most operators accept?
Bitcoin. Of the thirty-eight operators whose own material could be read in full, twenty-eight accept it, with Ethereum close behind at twenty-seven, Litecoin and Tether at twenty-two each, Dogecoin at seventeen and TRON at fourteen. For the operators whose terms could not be read the field is empty, which means unread rather than refused.
Does a stablecoin balance remove the risk?
It removes crypto volatility and adds two other things. A dollar-pegged balance still carries USD/DKK exchange exposure for anyone thinking in kroner, and Tether is a claim on a private issuer rather than a bearer asset. Stable describes the peg, not the whole position.
Does depositing in Monero make me anonymous to the casino?
No. A chain whose amounts and counterparties are not publicly readable says nothing about what the operator can see. The casino sees every bet, holds the balance, and keeps whatever verification clause its terms reserve. Coin choice changes what the public ledger shows, not the relationship with the company.
Does the coin change when I am asked for documents?
Not on anything we could read. Five of the hundred operators publish a figure at which verification starts — €2,500 at Bitcasino.io, Sportsbet.io and LiveCasino.io, $2,500 at Rocketpot, 2,000 USDT at Empire.io — and none of them makes it conditional on the asset. All five also reserve the right to ask below the stated amount.